Abstract

BackgroundThe Rating of Fatigue (ROF) scale can measure changes in perceived fatigue in a variety of contexts.ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to translate and subsequently validate the ROF scale in the French language.MethodsThe study was composed of three phases. Phase 1 involved a comprehensive translation, back-translation, and consolidation process in order to produce the French ROF scale. During phase 2, the face validity of the French ROF scale was assessed. A cohort of 60 native French speaking participants responded to a range of Likert scale items which probed the purposes of the ROF scale and what it is intended to measure. During phase 3, the convergent and divergent validity of the ROF scale was assessed during ramped cycling to exhaustion and 10 min of resting recovery.ResultsThe results from phase 1 demonstrated comparability and interpretability between the original and back-translated ROF scale. In phase 2, participants reported a high face validity, with a score of 3.48 ± 0.70 out of 4 when given the item probing whether the scale “measures fatigue”. This score further improved (3.67 ± 0.57, P = 0.01) after participants read the accompanying instructions. Participants were able to distinguish the purposes of the scale for measuring fatigue rather than exertion. In phase 3, strong correlations were found between ROF and heart rate (HR) both during exercise (r = 0.91, P < 0.01) and recovery (r = 0.92, P < 0.01), while discriminant validity between ROF and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was found during recovery.ConclusionThe present study permits the applications of the ROF scale in the French language.

Highlights

  • The study of fatigue has captivated researchers from a wide range of disciplines for centuries

  • The present study permits the applications of the Rating of Fatigue (ROF) scale in the French language

  • The ROF scale has never before been validated in the French language

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of fatigue has captivated researchers from a wide range of disciplines for centuries. Recent efforts have been made to provide a (2021) 7:25 universal definition of fatigue, applicable to both athletic and clinical populations, which encompasses the interdependent physical and cognitive processes that occur with numerous chronic health conditions, and during and following strenuous exercise [4]. To this end, Enoka and Duchateau [4] defined fatigue as a debilitating symptom of tiredness and weakness, dictated by interactions between performance fatigability, which involves an acute exercise-induced reduction in force and power output of the involved muscles, and perceived fatigability, involving changes in sensations that accompany fatigue. The Rating of Fatigue (ROF) scale can measure changes in perceived fatigue in a variety of contexts

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call