French speech-language therapy students' interest in evidence-based practice: A survey.

Abstract

Taking into account international studies interested in the development of evidence-based practice (EBP) in the speech and language therapy field, this survey investigated key issues with regard to students' perception of EBP. To determine how final-year students in France conceive EBP; to know if they feel competent in this area; to investigate any barriers to the use of EBP; and to assess their intention of using the EBP approach in their professional practice after graduating. Between January and April 2019, 182 advanced French students from 15 French speech-language university training centres (SLUTC) completed an online survey addressing these questions. The results show that 68.7% of students in the sample had a positive perception of the EBP. Between 54.9% and 73.6% of students felt rather competent to apply part of the approach, and 17% were sure to implement it in their own practice later on. Step 3 'Critically evaluating the evidence' was the most difficult. Regardless of the different EBP steps, the most important barrier for students who felt competent was the lack of practice; for students who did not feel competent, the major barriers were both the lack of theoretical knowledge and the lack of practice. A total of 61% of students reported not seeing EBP being practised by their clinical practice placements supervisors; 55% reported never having used their EBP knowledge during their clinical practice placements. The students interviewed had a positive perception of EBP. Nevertheless, these results demonstrate a need to improve the EBP curricula and to include EBP in clinical education, under the guidance of clinical practice placements supervisors. What is already known on the subject Despite the fact that EBP is widespread, previous studies have shown that it is not sufficiently used in the practice of speech and language therapists (SLT) and that young professionals tend to seek advice from experienced professionals rather than use EBP. Some students, despite their programme, do not feel competent enough to implement EBP. What this study adds to the existing knowledge French SLT students had a positive opinion of EBP despite barriers to implementation in their future professional practice, especially regarding the critical analysis of evidence. Moreover, the study reveals a need to practise EBP during clinical practice placements, and to create specific pedagogical framework for EBP. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The potential implication of this study is the use of the questionnaire to investigate the students' perception of EBP from a theoretical and a practical point of view, in collaboration with clinical practice placement supervisors, with the aim of promoting the task value and the self-efficacy as the two best factors to enhance students' motivation in favour of EBP.