Abstract

This chapter examines how the early nineteenth-century French historians’ loyalty and disloyalty to contemporary monarchy was discernible in their historiographical representations, especially concerning those of the Merovingian period. Aali focuses on the works of two different kinds of historians who were both active in historiographical production in the 1830s, Henri Martin (1810–1883) and Pierre-Denis, Count of Peyronnet (1778–1854). When writing about past royals the historians took a stand on the nature and role of the contemporary reigning monarchy, the July Monarchy. Neutrality was not an option and all historians had to choose their sides. They were thus both constructing and writing history.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.