Abstract
This paper describes the use of four models for comparing the cost of transporting manufactured products via freight pipeline, truck, truck on flat car (TOFC), and rail carload. It was found that cost comparison is sensitive to the transportation configuration, i.e., location, transport distance, and the number of terminals, annual tonnage, the size of shipment, the design of pipeline system, access conditions, and accounting procedure. The study shows that, based on the annualized cost methodology, the transport cost per ton-mile via freight pipeline is cost competitive with truck, rail, and TOFC for four of the five configurations within the Philadelphia-Chicago transportation corridor if the annual tonnage is high. For the fifth configuration, truck is clearly a less expensive mode. However, based on the project's present value methodology, pipeline is cost competitive in all five configurations. Based on the annualized cost methodology, pipeline becomes reasonably attractive for three configurations and for one configuration it compares very favorably (2.7 cents/ton-mile for pipe vs. 2.8 cents/ton-mile for T-R combination).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
