Abstract
Aim To identify how FOUL is investigated in patients with PD. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guideline was used, and the search was carried out in four databases, with no limit on publication date. Results 21 original articles were included. They used a variety of terms for upper-limb freezing. Some tasks evaluated only the movement of the limbs; others used associated objects. The tasks most often used to assess FOUL were flexion and extension of the index finger, finger tapping (index finger on thumb), and Funnel Task. In these tasks, movements of small amplitude/high frequency and the presence of a dual-task elicited more FOUL episodes. Conclusions This review highlights the need for development and validation of FOUL detection and assessment in clinical practice. The use of an appropriate assessment will prevent false-negative results and allow the phenomenon to be identified and treated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
