Abstract

Freeze–thaw cycles can promote soil N losses as a result of microbial and root cell lysis; however, minimal freeze–thaw effects have typically been observed in studies that have imposed moderate temperature cycles. We conducted laboratory incubations on surface soil (top 3 cm) collected in a temperate old field from late fall through mid-winter to examine how variation in freeze–thaw amplitude, number, timing of collection, and freezing rate altered soil extractable N. We varied freeze–thaw amplitude by imposing minimum cycle temperatures of 0, −1, −2, −5, and −10°C for a series of either one or two cycles and held control samples constant at 3°C. We also examined the effects of freezing rates of 1, 3, and 30°C h−1. We hypothesized that extractable N would be highest for both the maximum freezing amplitudes and rates. While multiple freeze–thaw cycles at −10°C and freeze–thaw cycles associated with artificially high freezing rates increased extractable N, freeze–thaw cycles representative of field conditions at our site had no effect on extractable N in late fall and early winter. By mid-winter there was a significant freeze–thaw cycle effect but, contrary to our prediction, less N was extracted from freeze–thaw treated samples than from the control samples, which remained thawed over the treatment period. Increased extractable N in control samples was driven by increased organic N rather than increased inorganic N. Our results suggest that freeze–thaw damage to soil organisms does not contribute substantially to N release in our system. Instead, soil extractable N may increase during mid-winter thaws as a result of increased soil proteolytic activity above freezing temperatures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call