Abstract
In what follows, I summarise an argument against prohibitions on freedom of speech with regard to criticism directed at public officials – namely, every person who has a legal power in an institution of the state, including the legislative branch (particularly parliament member), the judiciary (particularly judges) and the executive branch (including, for example, prosecutes, police officers) – and public institutions (rather than a public official at the institution) and the government in general (rather than a specific institution). Such criticism can include, for example, claims regarding the morality or legality of actions of public officials (for example, a claim that a police officer is corrupt), their qualifications (for example, a claim that a judge is lazy), or the efficiency of a certain institution (for example, the army). I argue that there are strong considerations in favour of criticising the performance of public officials (and institutions), and especially against legal (and particularly criminal) limitations on such criticism, and relatively weak considerations against this criticism, especially with regard to legal (and particularly criminal) limitations on criticising public officals.
Highlights
In what follows, I summarise an argument against prohibitions on freedom of speech with regard to criticism directed at public officials – namely, every person who has a legal power in an institution of the state, including the legislative branch, the judiciary and the executive branch – and public institutions and the government in general
I argue that these criminal prohibitions are unjustified since the considerations against them outweigh the consideration in favour of them
An analysis of the justification for limitations on freedom of expression should be conducted by taking several steps
Summary
I summarise an argument against prohibitions on freedom of speech with regard to criticism directed at public officials – namely, every person who has a legal power in an institution of the state, including the legislative branch ( parliament member), the judiciary ( judges) and the executive branch (including, for example, prosecutes, police officers) – and public institutions (rather than a public official at the institution) and the government in general (rather than a specific institution). I argue that these criminal prohibitions are unjustified since the considerations against them outweigh the consideration in favour of them
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.