Abstract

“If you take into account how much less than elsewhere there was a necessity in the prosperous Low Countries to think about the causes of the wealth of the nation, you will see clearly why economics did not share in the flowering of sciences that this country experienced during the seventeenth century” (van Rees 1865, 286). Two propositions may be inferred from this quotation: there are almost no memorable seventeenth-century Dutch economists; and during the period, Dutch economic welfare and free trade as institutional foundations were not the result of a well-formulated economic doctrine but evolved more or less spontaneously. Although the second proposition has interesting implications for the theory of institutional development, I will deal with it here only briefly. The first .proposition can be corroborated by a quick glance through relevant texts on the history of economic theory. Blaug (1985) mentions de Groot only in passing, as does Hutchison (1988). Before Adam Smith, Holland seems to have had little to contribute to the emergence of political economy. Schumpeter, well acquainted as usual with not only

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.