Abstract
Appropriate levels of arousal potential induce hedonic responses (i.e., emotional valence). However, the relationship between arousal potential and its factors (e.g., novelty, complexity, and uncertainty) have not been formalized. This paper proposes a mathematical model that explains emotional arousal using minimized free energy to represent information content processed in the brain after sensory stimuli are perceived and recognized (i.e., sensory surprisal). This work mathematically demonstrates that sensory surprisal represents the summation of information from novelty and uncertainty, and that the uncertainty converges to perceived complexity with sufficient sampling from a stimulus source. Novelty, uncertainty, and complexity all act as collative properties that form arousal potential. Analysis using a Gaussian generative model shows that the free energy is formed as a quadratic function of prediction errors based on the difference between prior expectation and peak of likelihood. The model predicts two interaction effects on free energy: that between prediction error and prior uncertainty (i.e., prior variance) and that between prediction error and sensory variance. A discussion on the potential of free energy as a mathematical principle is presented to explain emotion initiators. The model provides a general mathematical framework for understanding and predicting the emotions caused by novelty, uncertainty, and complexity. The mathematical model of arousal can help predict acceptable novelty and complexity based on a target population under different uncertainty levels mitigated by prior knowledge and experience.
Highlights
Acceptance of novelty and complexity of incoming information depend on receivers’ emotions
This study presents the relationship between the information content of perceived sensory stimuli and arousal potential
Information content to be processed after the perception of sensory stimuli corresponds to the formulation of free energy commonly found in various disciplines, such as physics, statistics, and neuroscience (Friston et al, 2006)
Summary
Acceptance of novelty and complexity of incoming information depend on receivers’ emotions. Berlyne considered both novelty and complexity to be collative properties that are sources of arousal potential (Berlyne, 1970). He suggested that an appropriate level of arousal potential would induce a positive hedonic response, but extreme arousal potentials induce negative responses. Arousal (i.e., intensity) and valence (i.e., positivity or negativity) are known to be dominant emotional dimensions (Russell, 1980; Lang, 1995). They comprise the core affect and are correlated with neural
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.