Abstract
In his comprehensive treatise On Human Beings, Albert the Great discusses a large number of questions centring on the nature of humans. A fundamental question in this context is in what sense humans are unique. Therefore, Albert also raises various questions concerning the features and capacities of nonhuman animals. One of the features that Albert examines is what is commonly called ‘free choice’ (liberum arbitrium). His answer to the question of whether only humans or also nonhuman animals possess free choice focuses on various components of volition, namely, free appetite, free judgment, and free choice. For in order to choose something one needs to desire or to have an appetite for it. This, in turn, requires a judgment about what is desirable or not. Moreover, this appetite and this judgment must not be determined, because otherwise it could not be said that one has freely or voluntarily chosen something. Although Albert’s answer to the question of whether nonhuman animals possess free will is negative, it is illuminating insofar as it scrutinises the assumptions lying behind an ascription of free choice to an animal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
