Abstract

This study examined if computer-based learning in the field of empirical research methods could be fostered by cooperative learning and feedback. Students (n = 137) were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions in a 2x2-factorial design: individual learning with and without feedback intervention, and dyadic learning with and without feedback intervention. Individuals and dyads performed problem-solving tasks on correlation within a computer-based learning environment. The feedback intervention consisted of comprehension tests with elaborated feedback. In the cooperative conditions, feedback referred to the performance of the dyad, hence it was group feedback. Results showed that the feedback intervention had a substantial positive effect on learning outcomes, while cooperative learning did not significantly influence achievement. Moreover, a significant interaction effect was found: in the feedback conditions, individuals performed better than dyads; however, without the feedback intervention, dyads were more successful. For pedagogical practice it can be concluded that the feedback intervention should be implemented both in individual and cooperative computer-based learning. Especially when students learn individually, feedback is important. Further research should investigate effects of the feedback intervention in a field stud

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.