Francisella novicida CRISPR-Cas Systems Can Functionally Complement Each Other in DNA Defense while Providing Target Flexibility.

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems are prokaryotic adaptive immune systems that facilitate protection of bacteria and archaea against infection by external mobile genetic elements. The model pathogen Francisella novicida encodes a CRISPR-Cas12a (FnoCas12a) system and a CRISPR-Cas9 (FnoCas9) system, the latter of which has an additional and noncanonical function in bacterial virulence. Here, we investigated and compared the functional roles of the FnoCas12a and FnoCas9 systems in transformation inhibition and bacterial virulence. Unlike FnoCas9, FnoCas12a was not required for F. novicida virulence. However, both systems were highly effective at plasmid restriction and acted independently of each other. We further identified a critical protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) necessary for transformation inhibition by FnoCas12a, demonstrating a greater flexibility for target identification by FnoCas12a than previously appreciated and a specificity that is distinct from that of FnoCas9. The effectors of the two systems exhibited different patterns of expression at the mRNA level, suggesting that they may confer distinct benefits to the bacterium in diverse environments. These data suggest that due to the differences between the two CRISPR-Cas systems, together they may provide F. novicida with a more comprehensive defense against foreign nucleic acids. Finally, we demonstrated that the FnoCas12a and FnoCas9 machineries could be simultaneously engineered to restrict the same nonnative target, thereby expanding the toolset for prokaryotic genome manipulation.IMPORTANCE CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a systems have been widely commandeered for genome engineering. However, they originate in prokaryotes, where they function as adaptive immune systems. The details of this activity and relationship between these systems within native host organisms have been minimally explored. The human pathogen Francisella novicida contains both of these systems, with the Cas9 system also exhibiting a second activity, modulating virulence through transcriptional regulation. We compared and contrasted the ability of these two systems to control virulence and restrict DNA within their native host bacterium, highlighting differences and similarities in these two functions. Collectively, our results indicate that these two distinct and reprogrammable endogenous systems provide F. novicida with a more comprehensive defense against mobile genetic elements.