Abstract

Moral distress in health care has been identified as a growing concern and a focus of research in nursing and health care for almost three decades. Researchers and theorists have argued that moral distress has both short and long-term consequences. Moral distress has implications for satisfaction, recruitment and retention of health care providers and implications for the delivery of safe and competent quality patient care. In over a decade of research on ethical practice, registered nurses and other health care practitioners have repeatedly identified moral distress as a concern and called for action. However, research and action on moral distress has been constrained by lack of conceptual clarity and theoretical confusion as to the meaning and underpinnings of moral distress. To further examine these issues and foster action on moral distress, three members of the University of Victoria/University of British Columbia (UVIC/UVIC) nursing ethics research team initiated the development and delivery of a multi-faceted and interdisciplinary symposium on Moral Distress with international experts, researchers, and practitioners. The goal of the symposium was to develop an agenda for action on moral distress in health care. We sought to develop a plan of action that would encompass recommendations for education, practice, research and policy. The papers in this special issue of HEC Forum arose from that symposium. In this first paper, we provide an introduction to moral distress; make explicit some of the challenges associated with theoretical and conceptual constructions of moral distress; and discuss the barriers to the development of research, education, and policy that could, if addressed, foster action on moral distress in health care practice. The following three papers were written by key international experts on moral distress, who explore in-depth the issues in three arenas: education, practice, research. In the fifth and last paper in the series, we highlight key insights from the symposium and the papers in the series, propose to redefine moral distress, and outline directions for an agenda for action on moral distress in health care.

Highlights

  • Moral distress in health care has been identified as a growing concern and a focus of research in nursing and health care for almost three decades

  • We have provided a beginning overview of the concept of moral distress and highlighted key issues related to conceptual and theoretical development, current research, policy, and education

  • There is a need for strong theoretical approaches that can balance the tension between individual and structural factors that shape experiences of moral distress

Read more

Summary

Conceptual and Theoretical Tensions

Understandings of moral distress differ by the extent to which the problem is located in individual and/or structural factors. Jameton (1984) first coined the term moral distress to capture the inability of nurses to act on what they believe is the right thing to do because of institutional constraints. Jameton’s definition has been widely used in nursing and health care and emphasizes institutional and external constraints on the ability of nurses to practice ethically His definition suggests that the constraints on the moral agency of nurses are beyond the control of individuals or located in the various institutions or structures that shape nurses’ work. Based on their research with nurses, pharmacists, physicians and other clinical staff, these authors found that health care providers reported moral distress when they had to make difficult choices between following rules or following their conscience They acted and made choices, but still experienced distress related to ethical dimensions of practice. Webster and Baylis (2000) highlighted the individual and ‘‘perceived constraints’’, including personal failings that prevent individuals from acting in ways that compromise their personal integrity Of note, they delineated the negative effects of unresolved moral distress (moral residue) that can linger and impact practice overtime. Exploration of moral distress in various cultural contexts, guided by clearly explicitly theoretical and conceptual understandings of moral distress, is needed

Empirical Research Tensions
Limited Engagement with Policy and Politics
Limited Attention to Ethics Education
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call