Abstract
Agri-food sustainability standards developed through multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are an increasingly prominent form of governance that seeks to enhance participation by a broader range of stakeholders in defining and implementing sustainable agricultural practices. However, they have been characterised by social scientists as largely depoliticising and marginalising in their effects, leading to responses from stakeholder groups such as contestation, compromises and attempts to ‘ratchet-up’ existing standards. In this paper, we consider a response to MSI-developed sustainability standards that has been given limited attention in the literature to date – the development of alternative standards schemes and the framing of sustainability in the context of South-South trade relationships. Through a focus on the Indonesian and Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil schemes (ISPO and MSPO), we apply Callon's writing on ‘framing’ to highlight how these schemes provide a response to the perceived stringent framing of sustainable palm oil in the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil standards. Our analysis shows that the ISPO and MSPO are important in the creation of alternative frames for including smallholders who may not have the capacities or resources to participate in the RSPO. More significantly, the ISPO and MSPO provide a way of reframing sustainable palm oil that enables the palm oil sector in Indonesia and Malaysia to bypass the perceived challenges of RSPO certification and to balance existing price-based demands from their main export markets of India and China with future prospective sustainability demands in those markets. The paper concludes by arguing that sustainability schemes geared towards markets in the Global South need to be given greater scrutiny in terms of how they: (a) address the exclusion generated by MSI-developed certification schemes, and (b) reframe sustainability in ways that meet the current and emerging market requirements in South-South trade.
Highlights
In recent years, there has been growing private sector engagement with the sustainability of global agri-food supply chains
This paper argues that research on the politics of agri-food sustainability standards needs to pay more attention to the development of standards schemes in the context of South-South trade relationships, which often involve different sustainability requirements to North-South trade – the predominant emphasis of the existing sustainability standards literature
Drawing upon Callon’s work on ‘framing’, we have conceptualised the development of sustainability standards schemes in the Global South as a response to the invisibilisation and exclusion generated by the framing of sustainable practices inscribed in standards schemes geared towards meeting the requirements of markets in the Global North
Summary
There has been growing private sector engagement with the sustainability of global agri-food supply chains. Of the paper, we focus on how the Indonesian and Malaysian governments have responded to the overflows and forms of exclusion generated by the RSPO framing of sustainable palm oil by introducing their own sustainable palm oil standards schemes, namely the ISPO and the MSPO These responses, which we characterise as forms of ‘habilitation’ (Callon, 2008) and ‘reframing’, seek to address the ‘too high’ framing of RSPO sustainable palm oil, which includes limited incentives for smallholder participation and the overflows regarding low market uptake of CSPO, offering alternative standards to meet current and prospective requirements for South-South trade
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
