Framing Disparities in Access to Medical Speech-Language Pathology Care in Rural Alabama.

Abstract

Rural-living residents of Alabama depend on rural hospitals and clinics staffed with physicians and allied health professionals including speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of the exploratory study was to examine the speech-language pathology workforce in health care facilities in nonmetropolitan Alabama counties to determine potential disparities in access and identify medical SLP deserts for rural Alabamians. The hospitals, rural health clinics, nursing homes, and rehabilitation centers for each of the 37 nonmetropolitan counties were identified through the 2020 Alabama Department of Public Health directories, and phone surveys were completed to determine medical SLP staffing at each facility. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were conducted. The initial review yielded 229 rural health care facilities with 223 ultimately included in the analysis and 176 facilities completing a phone inquiry (76.68%). Sixty-one (35.88%) reported employing at least one SLP and no facility stated staffing SLP assistants. Linear regression indicated a positive, yet moderate effect size between the reported number of SLPs staffed within each county and specific population of the county (r 2 = .519). Anecdotally, facilities reported difficulty in hiring and retaining SLPs due to rural geographical location. The exploratory findings suggest disparities in access to behavioral communication and swallowing care for rural residents in the state. The methodology employed for data collection and analysis may be applied to other states and U.S. territories, in an effort to frame the issue nationally and support rural health care policy across the United States. Further investigation regarding the cost effectiveness of telepractice, the availability of broadband Internet access, the efficacy of community-based service delivery, and the effectiveness of incentivized rural SLP graduate programs is warranted to mitigate the disparities in access.