Abstract

AbstractIn the digital age, to attract readers' attention, environmental activists may change the way corporate environmental information is reported and reinterpret it in social media. This paper aims to discuss how firms protect the perceived authenticity of their environmental disclosure. This study suggests that framing enables firms to clarify the disclosure focus for their readers in the information‐overload context. We propose five framing strategies and evaluate their effects on the stigmatized categorization, attribution, and diffusion of environmental information. By doing so, we add framing strategies to the managerial toolkit available for protecting the perceived authenticity of corporate voluntary environmental disclosure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.