Abstract

Abstract Starting point bias is a common problem in closed-ended non-market valuation studies. This article analyses two possible methods to reduce starting point bias in choice experiments, namely to induce value learning through completion of a payment ladder and to induce institutional learning by framing the choice experiment in a familiar context. The two methods are applied in a valuation study of sustainable flatfish fisheries in the North Sea. The results of this study suggest that there is considerable public support for policies aimed at reducing damage to the benthic ecosystem, limiting fishing pressure during the plaice spawning period, and restoring spawning stock biomass of plaice and sole. The payment ladder has a strong impact on respondents' sensitivity to the cost variable in the choice experiment. Neither learning method, however, has a statistically significant effect on starting point bias. JEL Classification Codes: Q22, Q51, D03

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.