Framework for Indirect Spatial Calibration of the Horizontal Plane of Endoscopic Laryngeal Images

Abstract

Calibrated horizontal-plane measurements from laryngeal images could contribute significantly to refining evidence-based practice and developing patient-specific models and precision-medicine approaches. Laser-projection endoscopes can address the need for direct calibrated measures; however, these systems are not widely available. This study presents the framework for an alternative indirect horizontal-plane calibration approach. A spatial attribute of a common object, a distinct characteristic that is maintained across images, may be used as a scale for the normalization of other spatial measurements. The outcome of this indirect approach could be used for absolute measurements (eg, in units of mm) or relative measurements (eg, percent change), depending on the information that is available from the common attribute. The required conditions of a common attribute for achieving a valid calibration outcome were studied. Three conditions were derived: registration accuracy of the common attribute, size consistency of the common attribute, and similarity in the vertical distance between the region of interest (ROI) (eg, vocal fold) and the common attribute. Any common attribute satisfying these three conditions was called proper and would result in a valid indirect calibration outcome. Three tests were presented for evaluating the properness of a common attribute. A data-driven statistical method was presented that can evaluate the registration accuracy of a common attribute. The second test used variation in calibrated lengths of a common attribute under different phonatory configurations for evaluating the size consistency condition. Finally, the effect of differences between vertical distances of the ROI and the common attribute was mathematically tested and quantified. The application of the proposed framework for indirect calibration was demonstrated using a pre existing dataset with a vocal fold as the ROI and four different common attributes (vocal fold length, vocal fold width, blood vessel on the vocal fold, and blood vessel on nearby tissue). The proposed registration-accuracy test was able to detect and eliminate instances of common attributes with low accuracies. The analysis suggested that among the studied four common attributes, the vocal fold length had the highest (ie, best) registration accuracy; however, the vocal fold length exhibited the lowest (ie, worst) size consistency. The analysis also suggested that, among the studied attributes, the vocal fold width offered the best trade-off among the three conditions and, hence, was a proper common attribute for calibrating spatial aspects of the vocal folds (length, displacement of edges, velocity, etc). Indirect calibration is a feasible alternative for calibration of laryngeal endoscopic images, given a proper common attribute is selected. Future work is needed to systematically evaluate the effects of various phonatory conditions on the characteristics of common attributes.