Abstract

IntroductionData integration by local and state governments is undertaken for the public good to support the interconnected needs of families and communities. Though data infrastructure is a powerful tool to support equity-oriented reforms, racial equity is rarely centered or prioritized as a core goal for data integration. This raises fundamental concerns, as integrated data increasingly provide the raw materials for evaluation, research, and risk modeling. Generally, institutions have not adequately examined and acknowledged structural bias in their history, or the ways in which data reflect systemic racial inequities in the development and administration of policies and programs. Meanwhile, civic data users and the public are rarely consulted in the development and use of data systems.ObjectivesThis paper presents a framework and site-based examples of “Work in Action” that were collaboratively generated by a civic data stakeholder workgroup from across the U.S. in 2019–2020.MethodsPurposive sampling was used to curate a diverse 15-person workgroup that used participatory action research and public deliberation to co-create a framework of best practices.ResultsThis framework aims to support agencies seeking to acknowledge and compensate for the harms and bias baked into data and practice. It is organized across six stages of the administrative data life cycle—planning, data collection, data access, use of algorithms/statistical tools, analysis, and reporting and dissemination. For each stage, the framework includes positive and problematic practices for centering racial equity, with site-based examples of “Work in Action” from across the U.S. Using this framework, the workgroup then developed a Toolkit for Centering Racial Equity Throughout Data Integration, a resource that has been broadly disseminated across the U.S.ConclusionsFindings indicate that centering racial equity within data integration efforts is not a binary outcome, but rather a series of small steps towards more equitable practice. There are countless ways to center racial equity across the data life cycle, and this framework provides concrete strategies for organizations to begin to grow that work in practice.

Highlights

  • Data integration by local and state governments is undertaken for the public good to support the interconnected needs of families and communities

  • The framework includes positive and problematic practices for centering racial equity, with site-based examples of “Work in Action” from across the U.S Using this framework, the workgroup developed a Toolkit for Centering Racial Equity Throughout Data Integration, a resource that has been broadly disseminated across the U.S

  • Findings indicate that centering racial equity within data integration efforts is not a binary outcome, but rather a series of small steps towards more equitable practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data integration by local and state governments is undertaken for the public good to support the interconnected needs of families and communities. Though data infrastructure is a powerful tool to support equity-oriented reforms, racial equity is rarely centered or prioritized as a core goal for data integration. Too often government organizations and their research partners fail to identify and address issues of bias in data Even if such issues are addressed, agencies are often ill equipped to repair trust and work towards justice in partnership with communities that have experienced harm. Policies, business rules, and narratives are affected by structural racism, which is the root cause of the racial disparities evident in system outcomes [4] Such disparities demonstrate the consequences of structural racism: that, as a group, BIPoC in the United States have worse outcomes in many human service system measures regardless of socioeconomic status [6]. Many agency solutions and data initiatives are largely disconnected from this root cause, and the “hunt for more data is [often] a barrier for acting on what we already know [7].”

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call