Abstract

Protected evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of salmonids require objective and measurable criteria for guiding their recovery. In this report, we develop a method for assessing population viability and two ways to integrate these population-level assessments into an assessment of ESU viability. Population viability is assessed with quantitative extinction models or criteria relating to population size, population growth rate, the occurrence of catastrophic declines, and the degree of hatchery influence. ESU viability is assessed by examining the number and distribution of viable populations across the landscape and their proximity to sources of catastrophic disturbance.Central Valley spring-run and winter-run Chinook salmon ESUs are not currently viable, according to the criteria-based assessment. In both ESUs, extant populations may be at low risk of extinction, but these populations represent a small portion of the historical ESUs, and are vulnerable to catastrophic disturbance. The winter-run Chinook salmon ESU, in the extreme case, is represented by a single population that spawns outside of its historical spawning range. We are unable to assess the status of the Central Valley steelhead ESU with our framework because almost all of its roughly 80 populations are classified as data deficient. The few exceptions are those populations with a closely associated hatchery, and the naturally-spawning fish in these streams are at high risk of extinction. Population monitoring in this ESU is urgently needed.Global and regional climate change poses an additional risk to the survival of salmonids in the Central Valley. A literature review suggests that by 2100, mean summer temperatures in the Central Valley region may increase by 2-8°C, precipitation will likely shift to more rain and less snow, with significant declines in total precipitation possible, and hydrographs will likely change, especially the the southern Sierra Nevada mountains. Warming at the lower end of the predicted range may allow spring-run Chinook salmon to persist in some streams, while making some currently utilized habitat inhospitable. At the upper end of the range of predicted warming, very little spring-run Chinook salmon habitat is expected to remain suitable.In spite of the precarious position of Central Valley salmonid ESUs, there are prospects for greatly improving their viability. Recovering Central Valley ESUs may require re-establishing populations where historical populations have been extirpated (e.g., upstream of major dams). Such major efforts should be focused on those watersheds that offer the best possibility of providing suitable habitat in a warmer future.

Highlights

  • Numerous evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of Pacific salmon and steelhead are listed as threatened or endangered species under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973

  • It provides quantitative criteria that allow that status of salmonid ESUs to be assessed in an objective way, and it points out areas where things need to improve for ESUs to be removed from the endangered species list

  • For Central Valley steelhead, there are insufficient data to assess the risk of any but a few populations, and we cannot assess the viability of this ESU using the quantitative approach described in this paper

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Numerous evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of Pacific salmon and steelhead are listed as threatened or endangered species under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. Perhaps 15 of the 18 or 19 historical populations of Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon are extinct, with their entire historical spawning habitats behind various impassable dams (Figure 3 and Table 3). Butte Creek and Deer Creek spring-run Chinook salmon are at low risk of extinction, satisfying both the PVA (Figure 4) and other viability criteria (Table 3). For the Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon ESU to satisfy the representation and redundancy rule, at least two populations would need to be re-established in the basalt-and-porous-lava region. This may require passage past Shasta and Keswick dams. That habitat fragmentation, degradation, and loss are likely having a strong negative impact on many resident as well as anadromous O. mykiss populations (Hopelain 2003)

Discussion
Summary
Findings
Introduction
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call