Fragranced Products and VOCs

Abstract

Vol. 119, No. 5 PerspectivesOpen AccessFragranced Products and VOCs Madhuri Singal, Danielle Vitale, and Ladd Smith Madhuri Singal Search for more papers by this author , Danielle Vitale Search for more papers by this author , and Ladd Smith Search for more papers by this author Published:1 May 2011https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103497Cited by:1AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit In the article “Scented Products Emit a Bouquet of VOCs,” Potera (2011) gave a broad overview of the work of Steinemann et al. (2010) regarding the quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from fragranced products. Unfortunately, crucial facts were omitted about the materials cited and the use of alternative substances.Potera (2011) quoted Steinemann et al. (2010), noting that some of the VOCs detected “are classified as toxic or hazardous by federal laws” and “a single fragrance in a product can . . . react with ozone in ambient air to form dangerous secondary pollutants.” Potera stated that limonene reacts with ozone to form formaldehyde but failed to mention that both limonene and pinene are naturally occurring materials found in citrus fruits and pine trees, respectively (Wei and Shibamoto 2007). Fragrance materials are naturally volatile; otherwise, they would not be detectable (Cometto-Muñiz et al. 1998). Langer et al. (2008) showed that exposure to limonene from peeling an orange is far greater than using limonene-scented cleaning products. These authors further showed that secondary organic pollutants formed from cleaning products exist in the lowest range of exposure and that a higher concentration of particulates is formed by peeling an orange.Potera (2011) quoted Steinemann et al. (2010), noting that “133 unique VOCs [were] identified among 25 products”; however, not all of the 133 VOCs are used as fragrance materials. For example, the highest reported concentration of d-limonene was 135 mg/m3 (unidentified air freshener) in an experiment using conditions completely atypical of consumer use (Steinemann et al. 2010).Although, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not issue safe exposure limits, they report those from other agencies [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)]. As of today, none of these agencies has issued a limit value for d-limonene. Germany (NIOSH 2005) and Sweden (International Agency for Research on Cancer 1999) have established limits for d-limonene of 110 mg/m3 and 150 mg/m3, respectively. Even under the adverse testing conditions reported by Steinemann et al. (2010), the d-limonene concentration of 135 mg/m3 still falls within safe exposure.Potera (2011) cited a telephone survey by Caress and Steinemann (2009) that attributed consumer health problems to the use of scented products; however, the percentages were not in context with the total population surveyed. Of those surveyed, 19% reported unspecified health problems and 11% noted irritation, all of which were subjectively ascribed to the use of scented laundry products (Caress and Steinemann 2009). While consumer complaints should be taken seriously, one may question the investigators’ acceptance of these self-assessments in the absence of objective confirmation by medical testing.Potera (2011) quoted Claudia Miller, who stated that “we need to find unscented alternatives ….” The fact is a variety of scented and unscented consumer products exist; thus, it is unnecessary to use potentially dangerous home mixtures, such as vinegar (acetic acid) and baking soda (sodium bicarbonate), which was recommended as a replacement for commercial cleaning products (Potera 2011). However, the safe exposure level for acetic acid, according to the ACGIH, NIOSH, and OSHA, is 25 mg/m3 over 8 hr (OSHA 2007), which suggests a higher toxicity than for limonene. Health effects resulting from inhalation exposure to acetic acid include respiratory irritation, coughing, headache, and dizziness (Iowa State University 2000).In addition, symptoms include pulmonary edema, chest pain, and hypotension; in contrast, d-limonene has not been associated with the development of any of these symptoms. Lacking published inhalation safety information for sodium bicarbonate, NIOSH recommends using a respirator when working with the dry particulate form (Mallinckrodt Baker Inc. 2009).Potera (2011) ended her article by quoting Claudia Miller’s statement that “the best smell is no smell.” This is a very subjective assessment and cannot be characterized as an objective, science-based conclusion supported by available data.ReferencesCaress SM, Steinemann AC. 2009. Prevalence of fragrance sensitivity in the American population. J Environ Health 71(7):46-5019326669. Medline, Google ScholarCometto-Muñiz JE, Cain WS, Abraham MH, Kumarsingh R. 1998. Trigeminal and olfactory chemosensory impact of selected terpenes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60(3):765-7709678663. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarInternational Agency for Research on Cancer. 1999. d-Limonene. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum 73:307–327Available: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol73/mono73-16.pdf. Google ScholarIowa State University. 2000. Material Safety Data Sheet. Acetic Acid Solutions, 0.1%–56%V/VAvailable: http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/MSDS/acetic_acid-0.1to56pct.htmaccessed 6 April 2011. Google ScholarLanger S, Modanova J, Arrhenius K, Ljungstrom E, Ekberg L. 2008. Ultrafine particles produced by ozone/limonene reactions in indoor air under low/closed ventilation conditions. Atmospheric Environment 42:4149-4159. Crossref, Google ScholarMallinckrodt Baker Inc. 2009. Material Safety Data Sheet. Sodium BicarbonateAvailable: http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/s2954.htmaccessed 6 April 2011. Google ScholarNIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2005. d-LimoneneAvailable: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0918.htmlaccessed 8 April 2011. Google ScholarOSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 2007. Chemical Sampling Information: Acetic AcidAvailable: http://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_216400.htmlaccessed 8 April 2011. Google ScholarPotera C. 2011. Scented products emit a bouquet of VOCs. Environ Health Perspect 119:A1621196139. Link, Google ScholarSteinemann AC, MacGregor IC, Gordon SM, Gallagher LG, Davis AL, Ribeiro DSet al.. 2011. Fragranced consumer products: chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted. Environ Impact Review Assess Rev 31:328-333doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.002[Online 27 October 2010]. Crossref, Google ScholarWei A, Shibamoto T. 2007. Antioxidant activities and volatile constituents of various essential oils. J Agric Food Chem 55(5):1737-174217295511. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Kim Y, Kim M, Chung B, Bang D, Lim S, Choi S, Lim D, Cho M, Yoon K, Kim H, Kim K, Kim Y, Kwack S and Lee B (2013) Safety Evaluation And Risk Assessment Of d -Limonene , Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10.1080/10937404.2013.769418, 16:1, (17-38), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. Vol. 119, No. 5 May 2011Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 May 2011Published in print1 May 2011 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.