Abstract
Current guidelines for design and assessment of buildings under tsunami actions do not explicitly state how to apply tsunami loads to buildings and which analysis methods to use in order to assess the structural response to the tsunami loads. In this paper, a reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frame, which is designed as a tsunami evacuation building, is selected as a case study and subjected to simulated 2011 Tohoku tsunami waves. To assess tsunami impact on the model building, different nonlinear static analyses, i.e. constant-height pushover (CHPO) and variable-height pushover (VHPO), are compared with nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results of VHPO provide a good prediction of engineering demand parameters and collapse fragility curves obtained from the dynamic analysis under a wide range of tsunami loading. On the other hand, CHPO tends to overestimate interstorey drift ratio (IDR) and underestimate column shear by about 5–20%. It provides a larger fragility, i.e. about 10% in median value, for global failure and a smaller fragility for local shear failure. On the basis of these results, it is recommended that VHPO be used in future fragility analysis of buildings subjected to tsunami. However, pushover methods might not be adequate in cases where the tsunami inundation force time-histories are characterised by a “double-peak”, which subjects the structure to a two-cycle load. Finally, it is found that tsunami peak force is better correlated to IDR than flow velocity and inundation depth for the considered structure. This suggests that the peak force would be a more efficient intensity measure than the other two in the development of tsunami fragility curves.
Highlights
Recent tsunami events (e.g. 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and 2011 Great East Japan tsunami) have caused numerous deaths and widespread damage
Current guidelines for the design and assessment of buildings under tsunami actions do not explicitly state how best to apply the tsunami loads to the building in structural analysis nor which analysis methods to use in order to assess the structural response to the tsunami loads
Despite the recognised limitations of this study, this paper provides some initial guidance on both these points
Summary
Recent tsunami events (e.g. 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and 2011 Great East Japan tsunami) have caused numerous deaths and widespread damage. It is worth noting that such a loss does not include costs related to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant crisis nor indirect losses, such as supply-chain disruptions and retail trade and tourism reduction due to restrained consumption and radiation fears. These observed consequences from tsunami can only be reduced through the development of comprehensive risk mitigation plans based on tsunami impact scenarios and risk assessments. Analytical fragility functions can be used together with empirical assessments to provide a deeper understanding of structural behaviour under tsunami actions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.