Abstract
Abstract This contribution focuses on fragment 2 of 2QRuthb, which attests several difficulties from a material, palaeographic, and textual perspective. The analysis proposes a hypothesis regarding its composition and the identification of the text. This fragment may be considered a textual witness of Ruth 3:10–11 and it attests a textual variant, which agrees with the Septuagint against the Masoretic Text.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
