Abstract
In linear elastic fracture mechanics, the critical stress intensity factor (CSIF) is related to the surface energy calculated from the bond energy in the reference configuration. For nanomaterials, the difference between the thus computed CSIF and that found from other methods is attributed to lattice trapping. We show here that the energy release rate (and hence the CSIF) determined from the energy of bonds on the crack surface in the current configuration agrees with that estimated by the traditional methods employing the fracture stress and the initial crack length. We demonstrate this by using molecular dynamics simulations with the Tersoff potential by studying crack propagation in a pre-cracked monolayer boronitrene.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.