Abstract

The longitudinal fracture toughnesses of human cortical bone were compared to those of bovine cortical bone to test the hypothesis that although human osteonal bone is significantly weaker and more compliant than primary (plexiform) bone, it is not less tough than primary bone. The fracture toughness indices, critical strain energy release rate ( G c ) and critical stress intensity factor ( K c ), were determined for human Haversian bone and bovine bone under tension (Mode I) loading using the compact tension method. The effects of thickness, crack growth range and anisotropy on fracture indices for slow stable crack growth in cortical bone were determined. Plane strain assumptions required for application of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to bone were investigated. Longitudinal oriented fracture toughness tests were used to assess the crack inhibiting effect of human bone microstructure on frature resistance. Human bone K c calculated from the stress concentration formula for 2 and 3 mm thick specimens equaled 4.32 and 4.05 MN m −3 2 , respectively. Human bone G c calculated from the compliance method equaled 827 Nm −1 for 2 mm thick specimens and 595 Nm −1 for 3 mm thick specimens. It was found that crack growth range, thickness and material assumptions affect fracture toughness. K c calculated from G c using an anisotropic relation provided the lowest estimate of K c and equaled 3.31 MN m −3 2 for 2 mm thick specimens and 2.81 MN m −3 2 for 3 mm thick specimens. Both K c and G c were significantly reduced after being adjusted to ASTM standard thickness using ratios determined from bovine bone. The fracture toughness of bovine bone relative to human bone ranged from 1.08 to 1.66. This was compared to the longitudinal strength of bovine bone relative to the longitudinal strength of human bone which is approximately equal to 1.5. We found that even though human bone is significantly weaker than bovine bone, relative to its strength, the toughness of human and bovine bone are roughly similar, but the data were not sufficiently definitive to answer the question of which is tougher.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.