Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different marginal designs (deep chamfer, vertical, and modified vertical with reverse shoulder) on the fracture strength and failure modes of monolithic zirconia crowns. Materials and Methods Thirty sound human maxillary first premolar teeth with comparable size were used in this study. The teeth were divided randomly into three groups according to the preparation design ( n = 10): (1) group A: teeth prepared with a deep chamfer finish line; (2) group B: teeth prepared with vertical preparation; and (3) group C: teeth prepared with modified vertical preparation, where a reverse shoulder of 1 mm was placed on the buccal surface at the junction of middle and occlusal thirds. All samples were scanned by using an intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam, Sirona, Germany), and then the crowns were designed by using Sirona InLab 20.0 software and milled with a 5-axis machine. Each crown was then cemented on its respective tooth with self-adhesive resin cement by using a custom-made cementation device. A single load to failure test was used to assess the fracture load of each crown by using a computerized universal testing machine that automatically recorded the fracture load of each sample in Newton (N). Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed statistically by using one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni test at a level of significance of 0.05. Results The highest mean of fracture load was recorded by chamfer (2,969.8 N), which followed by modified vertical (2,899.3 N) and the lowest mean of fracture load was recorded by vertical (2,717.9 N). One-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference among the three groups. Bonferroni test showed a significant difference between group A and group B, while a nonsignificant difference was revealed between group C with group A and group B. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the mean values of fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns of all groups were higher than the maximum occlusal forces in the premolar region. The modification of the vertical preparation with a reverse shoulder placed at the buccal surface improved the fracture strength up to the point that it was statistically nonsignificant with the chamfer group.

Highlights

  • Zirconia has gained popularity because of its superior mechanical properties related to the transformation toughening mechanism.[1]

  • Samples were divided randomly into three groups (n = 10) according to the preparation design: Group A: teeth prepared with a horizontal preparation; Group B: teeth prepared with vertical preparation; Group C: teeth prepared with modified vertical preparation

  • The highest mean value of the fracture strength was recorded by group A (2,969.8 ± 182.9 N), in which the crowns were prepared with a chamfer finish line, followed by group C (2,899.3 ± 164.8) and the lowest mean value was recorded by group B (2,717.9 ± 241.7 N), in which the crowns were prepared with vertical preparation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Zirconia has gained popularity because of its superior mechanical properties related to the transformation toughening mechanism.[1]. The horizontal preparation using the chamfer and shoulder finish lines has been accepted as the gold standard for all-ceramic restoration These types of margins are invasive in terms of sound tooth structure removal that is critical for biological and esthetic concepts.[6] The introduction of high-strength polycrystalline materials allowing the use of vertical preparation as a less extensive alternative to the horizontal (chamfer and shoulder).[7,8,9] The vertical margins can provide the most acute marginal restoration that preserves maximum sound tooth structure[10]; this is crucial for vital teeth and root canal-filled teeth to reduce stresses on the abutment tooth when restored with a crown.[11] the type of the restoration margin appears to be the most technically challenging issue as cracks may be induced from the occlusal surface to the thin margin.[12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.