Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the profiles of different upper extremity fractures, particularly those presenting as a 1st incident can inform prevention and management strategies. The purpose of this population-level study was to describe first incident fractures of the upper extremity in terms of fracture characteristics and demographics.MethodsCases with a first adult upper extremity (UE) fracture from the years 2013 to 2017 were extracted from administrative data in Ontario. Fracture locations (ICD-10 codes) and associated characteristics (open/closed, associated hospitalization within 1-day, associated nerve, or tendon injury) were described by fracture type, age category and sex. Standardized mean differences of at least 10% (clinical significance) and statistical significance (p < 0.01) in ANOVA were used to identify group differences (age/sex).ResultsWe identified 266,324 first incident UE fractures occurring over 4 years. The most commonly affected regions were the hand (93 K), wrist/forearm(80 K), shoulder (48 K) or elbow (35 K). The highest number of specific fractures were: distal radius (DRF, 47.4 K), metacarpal (30.4 K), phalangeal (29.9 K), distal phalangeal (24.4 K), proximal humerus (PHF, 21.7 K), clavicle (15.1 K), radial head (13.9 K), and scaphoid fractures (13.2 K). The most prevalent multiple fractures included: multiple radius and ulna fractures (11.8 K), fractures occurring in multiple regions of the upper extremity (8.7 K), or multiple regions in the forearm (8.4 K). Tendon (0.6% overall; 8.2% in multiple finger fractures) or nerve injuries were rarely reported (0.3% overall, 1.5% in distal humerus). Fractures were reported as being open in 4.7% of cases, most commonly for distal phalanx (23%). A similar proportion of females (51.5%) and males were present in this fracture cohort, but there were highly variant age-sex profiles across fracture subtypes. Fractures most common in 18–40-year-old males included metacarpal and finger fractures. Fractures common in older females were: DRF, PHF and radial head, which exhibited a dramatic increase in the over-50 age group.ConclusionsUE fracture profiles vary widely by fracture type. Fracture specific prevention and management should consider fracture profiles that are highly variable according to age and sex.

Highlights

  • Clinicians and health systems must manage the large volume of upper extremity fractures that present for care

  • MacDermid et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2021) 22:996 extremity fractures like distal radius fractures (DRF) and proximal humerus fractures (PHF) that occur from a fall from level ground are classified as fragility fractures and considered an early indicator of compromised bone health [1]

  • General description of cohort After exclusions from the potential cohort (n = 506,071), mostly related to age (n = 174,378), we were left with a cohort of 266,324 adults with a first upper extremity fracture occurring over a four- year interval (n = 44,236 were excluded because they had prior fractures) (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinicians and health systems must manage the large volume of upper extremity fractures that present for care. Previous studies that have focused on the epidemiology of upper extremity fractures have focused on more common fractures [2], the wrist [3], hand [4] and proximal humerus fractures [5, 6]. Understanding the profiles of different upper extremity fractures, those presenting as a 1st incident can inform prevention and management strategies. The purpose of this population-level study was to describe first incident fractures of the upper extremity in terms of fracture characteristics and demographics

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call