Fracture of particulate filled polymers

Abstract

AbstractThe addition of particulate mineral fillers to polymers confers certain mechanical property improvements automatically. Stiffness increases, creep diminishes and distortion at elevated temperatures is often reduced. However, the fracture energy of a polymer, as measured in impact, cracking or tearing tests, may vary quite unpredictably when filler is incorporated. In some special cases the fracture energy increases when small amounts of filler are added although it falls away again at higher volume loadings. This enhancement of polymer toughness by filler is an example of reinforcement. More generally the addition of filler causes a continuous and drastic reduction in fracture energy, resulting in a brittle, weak product.This paper seeks to explain the common degrading effect of filler on polymer fracture energy by considering the progress of a crack through the composite material. The crack travels through regions of polymer and also along the interfaces between polymer and filler. Experiment demonstrates that, although fracture of the polymer regions absorbs considerable energy, fracture of the interfaces usually requires very little. These weak interfaces do not resist cracking and are the cause of brittleness in particulate filled systems.This idea was quantified for thermoplastics such as low density polyethylene and poly (methylmethacrylate) filled with colloidal silica by twin‐roll milling. Where the interfacial adhesive energy was much smaller than the polymer fracture energy, the composite toughness dropped as predicted when filler was added. The particle size, the nature or dispersion of the filler, and the crystallinity of the polymer used, had little influence on this phenomenon, as pointed out theoretically.The crucial parameters influencing the fracture energy of the filled polymer were found to be the volume fraction of filler and the interfacial adhesion between polymer and filler. By chemical treatments the adhesive energy between filler and polymer was raised until the interface was almost as tough as the polymer itself. In this case the filled polymer showed good fracture toughness, lending further support to the theory.