Fracture liaison services: do they reduce fracture rates?

Abstract

The fracture liaison service (FLS) care is considered the most appropriate organizational approach for secondary fracture prevention. We performed a literature search to evaluate to what extent the introduction of a FLS reduced subsequent fracture rates. We identified five studies that compared subsequent fracture rates. These studies varied in study design, proportion of women, baseline and subsequent fracture type [vertebral fracture (VF), non-VF (NVF) or hip fractures], duration of follow-up, response rates of attending the FLS, as well as variables included in adjusted analyses (age, sex, baseline fracture, time dependency). In two studies comparing hospitals with and without a FLS, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for subsequent fractures was significantly lower in the FLS hospitals (HR: 0.84 during the first year, 0.44 during the second year for subsequent NVFs after baseline NVF, and 0.67 during the third year for subsequent VFs + NVFs after baseline VFs + NVFs). When comparing fracture rates before (pre-FLS) and after (post-FLS) introduction of a FLS, the adjusted HR for subsequent NVFs after baseline NVF was significantly lower in the post-FLS group after 2 years in one study (HR = 0.65) and nonsignificant in another study for subsequent hip fractures after baseline hip fracture. One study comparing pre-FLS and post-FLS with a follow-up of less than a year did not demonstrate a significant difference in subsequent fracture risk. In conclusion, only five FLS studies with heterogeneous study designs are available, three of them reported a lower subsequent fracture rate related to FLS care. Larger and long-term studies will be needed to further quantify the effect of FLS care on subsequent fracture risk.