Abstract

PurposeTo compare the CFR-PEEK plates with conventional plates in fracture fixation with regards to clinical and radiological outcomes and complications.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in four online databases independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. The identified relevant studies were assessed against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality was carried out.ResultsNine studies (patient n = 361) out of 6594 records were included for analysis: 2 RCTs (n = 63), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 151), and 4 retrospective cohort studies (n = 147). Studies were grouped per anatomic area of fixation. Four studies (n = 200) examined fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Two studies (n = 74) examined fixation of distal radius fractures. Two studies (n = 53) assessed outcomes of fixation of distal femur fractures. One study (n = 87) assessed the outcomes of fixation of ankle fractures. All nine studies reported very high union rates (from 91% in distal femur to 100% in upper limb) for the CFR-PEEK plate groups and low complication rates. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, and rate of complications as compared to the conventional plate groups.ConclusionCFR-PEEK plates have high union rates in extremity fracture fixation similar to conventional plates with comparable good clinical outcomes and a very low and comparable rate of complications. Considering their advantages, CFR-PEEK plates seem to be valid alternative to conventional plating.

Highlights

  • Carbon fibers are fibers of about 5–10 μm the majority of which is composed of carbon atoms

  • The use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants is an emerging field in orthopaedic surgery because of the numerous advantages this material offers compared to its conventional counterparts and these can be summarized as follows: (1) modulus of elasticity close to bone, avoiding stress-shielding and resultant bone resorption (2) radiolucency and enhanced ability to accurately achieve fracture reduction and monitor healing, (3) decreased artefact in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans, (4) no metal allergy, and increased osteoinductive properties and biocompatibility with minimal implant-related inflammatory response, (5) absence of cold welding at the plate-screw interface, (4–11)

  • The purpose of this study was to conduct a focused systematic review to report the outcomes and complications of CFR-PEEK plates used for the fixation of extremity fractures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carbon fibers are fibers of about 5–10 μm the majority of which is composed of carbon atoms. The use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants is an emerging field in orthopaedic surgery because of the numerous advantages this material offers compared to its conventional counterparts (e.g., stainless steel) and these can be summarized as follows: (1) modulus of elasticity close to bone, avoiding stress-shielding and resultant bone resorption (2) radiolucency and enhanced ability to accurately achieve fracture reduction and monitor healing, (3) decreased artefact in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans, (4) no metal allergy, and increased osteoinductive properties and biocompatibility with minimal implant-related inflammatory response, (5) absence of cold welding at the plate-screw interface, (4–11). The purpose of this study was to conduct a focused systematic review to report the outcomes and complications of CFR-PEEK plates used for the fixation of extremity fractures

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call