Fractional CO2 laser - assisted methylene blue photodynamic therapy is a potential alternative therapy for onychomycosis in the era of antifungal resistance

Abstract

BackgroundTreatment of onychomycosis is challenging by virtue of the impact of nail disfigurement, the location of the fungi within the nail and reported antifungal resistance worldwide. Light-based technologies are promising primary or adjunctive therapeutic modalities. We aimed to compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy and fractional CO2 laser monotherapy either alone or in combination for onychomycosis. Patients and methodsThis prospective randomized comparative study was conducted on 51 onychomycosis patients divided into three groups. In group A, patients were treated using 6 photodynamic therapy sessions using methylene blue and IPL (560 to 700 nm, fluence 12 J/cm2). Group B patients were treated using 6 bimonthly fractional CO2 laser sessions (10,600 nm, 1.600 mj energy and 0.6 mm density) and group C patients were treated using 6 combined fractional CO2 laser and photodynamic therapy sessions. Patients were evaluated mycologically, dermoscopically and clinically by calculation of proximal nail diameter percentage at baseline, monthly, at the end of treatment and after a 6‐month follow‐up period post-treatment. ResultsCandida was the most commonly isolated organismin in 64.7%, 70.6% and 70.6% of the pateints in groups A, B and C, respectively. The dermoscopic findings in the total dystrophic onychomycosis was subungual hyperkeratosis in 6 patients (100%), longitudinal streaks and striae in 1 patient (16.7%). In dorsolateral subungual onychomycosis, jagged proximal edge in 31 patients (70.5%), and pigmentation in 30 patients (68.2%) were noted. In proximal subungual onychomycosis irregular matt patches were seen in 1 patient (100%). Proximal nail diameter percentage showed statistically significant improvement after treatment and 6 months follow up in the 3 studied groups. Mean increase of proximal nail diameter after treatment was highest in group C (52.94 ± 20.24), followed by group B (43.82 ± 21.03) and least in group A (35.29 ± 17.0). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.044). Reported side effects were mild-moderate pain, discoloration and paronychia. ConclusionWe conclude that fractional CO2 laser and photodynamic monotherapy, and their combination achieve high success rates, good patient satisfaction and safety profile. Fractional CO2-assisted photodynamic therapy is associated with the highest improvement over either fractional CO2 or photodynamic therapy alone.