Abstract

In his 1987 classic book on multiple imputation (MI), Rubin used the fraction of missing information, γ, to define the relative efficiency (RE) of MI as RE = (1 + γ/m)−1/2, where m is the number of imputations, leading to the conclusion that a small m (≤5) would be sufficient for MI. However, evidence has been accumulating that many more imputations are needed. Why would the apparently sufficient m deduced from the RE be actually too small? The answer may lie with γ. In this research, γ was determined at the fractions of missing data (δ) of 4%, 10%, 20%, and 29% using the 2012 Physician Workflow Mail Survey of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). The γ values were strikingly small, ranging in the order of 10−6 to 0.01. As δ increased, γ usually increased but sometimes decreased. How the data were analysed had the dominating effects on γ, overshadowing the effect of δ. The results suggest that it is impossible to predict γ using δ and that it may not be appropriate to use the γ-based RE to determine sufficient m.

Highlights

  • When Rubin deduced the sufficient m using the γ-based relative efficiency (RE), the γ values listed in the table ranged from 0.1 to 0.9

  • When he concluded that m = 2 or 3 would be sufficient, he was assuming γ ≤ 0.5

  • He mentioned that in the simplest case, γ could have the same value as δ [1]. Reading these descriptions of γ, people may expect that the magnitude of γ would be somewhat similar to δ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rubin’s 1987 book Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys [1] is no doubt the most influential literature in the research field of multiple imputation (MI). It is in this book that Rubin described the pa-. How to cite this paper: Pan, Q.Y. and Wei, R. (2016) Fraction of Missing Information (γ) at Different Missing Data Fractions in the 2012 NAMCS Physician Workflow Mail Survey. Wei rameter γ, which he termed as “the fraction of missing information”, and used it to define the relative efficiency (RE) of MI as [1]: RE=

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call