Abstract

Certain facial features provide useful information for recognition of facial expressions. In two experiments, we investigated whether foveating informative features of briefly presented expressions improves recognition accuracy and whether these features are targeted reflexively when not foveated. Angry, fearful, surprised, and sad or disgusted expressions were presented briefly at locations which would ensure foveation of specific features. Foveating the mouth of fearful, surprised and disgusted expressions improved emotion recognition compared to foveating an eye or cheek or the central brow. Foveating the brow led to equivocal results in anger recognition across the two experiments, which might be due to the different combination of emotions used. There was no consistent evidence suggesting that reflexive first saccades targeted emotion-relevant features; instead, they targeted the closest feature to initial fixation. In a third experiment, angry, fearful, surprised and disgusted expressions were presented for 5 seconds. Duration of task-related fixations in the eyes, brow, nose and mouth regions was modulated by the presented expression. Moreover, longer fixation at the mouth positively correlated with anger and disgust accuracy both when these expressions were freely viewed (Experiment 2b) and when briefly presented at the mouth (Experiment 2a). Finally, an overall preference to fixate the mouth across all expressions correlated positively with anger and disgust accuracy. These findings suggest that foveal processing of informative features is functional/contributory to emotion recognition, but they are not automatically sought out when not foveated, and that facial emotion recognition performance is related to idiosyncratic gaze behaviour.

Highlights

  • Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial featuresIn this study, we investigate the differential contributions of foveal and extrafoveal visual processing of facial features to the identification of facially expressed emotions [see e.g., 1]

  • Planned comparisons revealed that anger recognition accuracy with fixation at the brow (M = 0.755, SD = 0.112) was higher compared to fixation at the cheeks (M = 0.7, SD = 0.132), t(32) = 2.45, p = .01, dz = 0.43, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) [0.12 1] (BonferroniHolm adjusted α = .0167)

  • Using a combination of angry, fearful, surprised and sad expressions in a brief-fixation paradigm, we aimed to investigate the contribution of initially fixating an informative facial feature to emotion recognition and seeking out of informative facial features when these are not initially fixated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigate the differential contributions of foveal and extrafoveal visual processing of facial features to the identification of facially expressed emotions [see e.g., 1]. The fovea, a small region of the retina that corresponds to the central 1.7 ̊ of the visual field [2], is preferentially specialized for processing fine spatial detail. With increasing eccentricity from the fovea, there is a decline in both visual acuity (i.e., the spatial resolving capacity of the visual system) and contrast sensitivity (i.e., the ability to detect differences in contrast) [3,4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.