Abstract

Four-hour voiding observation with provocation test (VOP) using a scale, a damp detector and ultrasound for determination of residuals, is an easily performed non-invasive method for the evaluation of bladder function in newborns. Neonatal bladder function evaluated with VOP has been described for healthy newborns (HN) but not for children with spinal dysraphism (SD), for whom early bladder evaluation is essential for decisions regarding Clean Intermittent Catheterization and follow-up. The aim of the present study was to describe voiding observation with provocation test in newborns with spinal dysraphism and compare with corresponding data for healthy newborns. At a tertiary hospital, a 4h voiding observation with provocation (VOP) was performed in 50 neonates (22 girls, 28 boys) with spinal dysraphism (37 open SD, 13 closed SD) consecutively evaluated for possible neurogenic bladder-sphincter dysfunction (1998-2019). All newborns with open SD and 4/13 with closed SD had been through postnatal neurosurgery before the test. Mean age was 10 days. Voiding observation was performed during 4h with visual observation the fourth hour recording behavior and urinary flow (e.g. stream, dribbling). Finally, bladder provocations (e.g. suprapubic compression) were performed, and any leakage was noted. Findings were compared to those of 50 healthy newborns (HN) earlier published (Gladh etal., 2002). There were no significant differences in background data such as gender, age or diuresis between newborns with SD and HN. Voiding observation with provocation test of children with SD revealed significant differences compared to HN see summary table. Some children with SD had frequent small voids/leakages and low bladder volumes while three had no voiding and high volumes. Leakage during bladder provocation test and not voiding with a stream was not seen in HN but were common in newborns with SD (69% resp. 74%) (p<0.01). A child with these findings should thus be investigated further. Identifying children needing Clean Intermittent Catheterization is important as well as being able to postpone or refrain from invasive urodynamic studies if not strongly indicated. VOP may give valuable information for these judgements. Newborns with spinal dysraphism differ from healthy newborns in many aspects of bladder function. Bladder function varies between newborns with closed and open spinal dysraphism. Many newborns with spinal dysraphism leak at bladder provocation and void without a stream but healthy newborns do not. Early determination of post-void residuals is mandatory in children with spinal dysraphism and non-invasive VOP gives this information in a standardized way, also adding information on frequency, voiding with a stream and leakage at provocation.

Highlights

  • Spinal dysraphism (SD) constitutes a heterogeneous group of conditions with very diverse consequences for the affected individuals [1e4]

  • Determination of post-void residuals is mandatory in children with spinal dysraphism and non-invasive voiding observation with provocation (VOP) gives this information in a standardized way, adding information on frequency, voiding with a stream and leakage at provocation

  • We show that voiding observation with provocation test in newborns with spinal dysraphism significantly differs regarding maximum and median voided volumes, voiding frequency and post-void residuals as compared to healthy newborns

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal dysraphism (SD) constitutes a heterogeneous group of conditions with very diverse consequences for the affected individuals [1e4]. In infants with closed spinal dysraphism, i.e. with intact skin coverage of the spine, there is a greater variation in bladder function ranging from completely normal to bladder dysfunction with high risk of renal damage [10]. Recommendations from the International Children’s Continence Society regarding management considering both the anatomical subtype of closed SD and the clinical situation has been published [4]. In these patients, the spinal cord is often tethered and the presence or not of neurological consequences of the tethering, i.e. motor deficits or bladder-sphincter dysfunction, is crucial in the decision on whether to perform detethering neurosurgery [4]. A national quality register in Sweden can provide valuable data [19]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.