Abstract

Four years of data are reported on the drug cost avoidance and the net cost savings associated with a clinical pharmacy intervention program. In 1986 the pharmacy department at a 324-bed nonprofit community medical center began a clinical intervention program by adding one full-time equivalent for providing clinical services. A new clinical pharmacist position was created in 1988. A reorganization in 1989 resulted in further increases in staffing, including the creation of a clinical coordinator position to oversee the intervention program, and in administrative time. Staff pharmacists self-report a broad range of interventions on a clinical documentation form. During the period 1986-1989, monthly data on the number of types of interventions recommended, the percentage of recommendations accepted by the medical staff, and drug cost avoidance were tabulated. Cost avoidance was calculated by subtracting the cost of therapy ordered by the physician from the cost of therapy initiated as a result of the intervention. Net drug cost savings were calculated by subtracting from cost avoidance the cost of pharmacist time required for performing the interventions. The average number of interventions per month ranged from 170 in 1986 to 292 in 1990. During an 18-month period before the clinical coordinator was added, average monthly cost avoidance and net savings were $4932 and $3739, respectively. Average monthly cost avoidance increased to $6244 and savings to $4644 in a 12-month period after the clinical coordinator was added. A four-year study of a clinical intervention program showed that the dollar value and impact outlasted the initial success expected for such programs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.