Abstract

Transparency is a key emerging requirement in modern businesses and their information systems. Transparency refers to the information which flows amongst stakeholders for the purpose of informed decision-making and taking the right action. Transparency is generally associated with positive connotations such as trust and accountability. However, it has been shown that it could have adverse effects such as information overload and affecting decisions objectiveness. This calls for systematic approaches for transparency to ensure its cost-effectiveness and avoid such adverse side effects. This is especially true considering that the relatively few works in the literature on transparency requirements have focused mainly on making information available and accessible and have paid little focus on the information receivers’ side and making it meaningful for them. In this paper, we reflect on our previous research on transparency and its multi-faceted constructs and review multi-disciplinary conceptualisation and propose four reference models which are meant to form a holistic conceptual baseline for transparency requirements in information systems. These reference models cover transparency actors, transparency meaningfulness, transparency usefulness, and information quality in transparency. We also discuss the interdependencies amongst these four reference models and their implications for requirements engineers and information system analysts. As a proof of concept, we analyse a mainstream transparency document, the United Kingdom Freedom of Information Act, in the light of our reference models and demonstrate the need to consider transparency more holistically and the need to include the information receiver’s perspective and the inter-relations amongst various properties and constituents of transparency as well. We then highlight areas of improvement informed by our analysis.

Highlights

  • Transparency is derived from the Medieval Latin word ‘‘transparentum’’ and means showing light through [77]

  • We presented and discussed four reference models for transparency requirements in information systems

  • We examined the interdependencies amongst these reference models and how they should be considered during the management of transparency requirements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transparency is derived from the Medieval Latin word ‘‘transparentum’’ and means showing light through [77]. This becomes more important when organisations decide to be transparent on a voluntary basis without the existence of constraints or regulatory requirements In such cases, the main focus would be making transparency more meaningful and useful to the audience, the characteristic which has not been the main focus of various reviewed works in the requirements engineering literature on information systems. We propose four reference models for transparency requirements in information systems in order to enable requirements engineers and information system analysts to better manage stakeholders’ transparency requirements These reference models capture: (1) the actors involved in the process of transparency provision and the information flow amongst them, (2) the meaningfulness of the information made transparent through the disclosure of information, (3) the usefulness of such information for a particular audience in terms of providing them with decision-making capabilities through the disclosed information, and (4) the quality of the information disclosed to its stakeholders.

Background and related work
Transparency reference models
Reference model 1
Reference model 2
Reference model 3
Information availability
Information interpretation
Information accessibility
Information perception
Information understandability
Information acceptance
Information actionability
Transparency usefulness and transparency meaningfulness
Reference model 4: information quality in transparency
Interdependencies amongst models
Interdependencies between transparency usefulness and transparency actors
Case study
FOIA and Transparency Actors Wheel
FOIA and Transparency Depth Pyramid
FOIA and Transparency Achievement Spectrum
FOIA and information quality in transparency
Discussion on FOIA
FOIA is mainly associated with mandatory transparency
It is important to manage occasions where transparency should not be provided
Managing transparency requirements is costly
Transparency is meant to be communicated efficiently
Transparency provision can become vexatious
The transparency of transparency requirements can also be problematic
Conclusion
75. United Kingdom Government
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.