Abstract
BackgroundIt is well established that trainee doctors struggle with the transition from medical school to starting work and feel unprepared for many aspects of their new role. There is evidence that suitable induction experiences improve competence and confidence, but available data indicate that trainee doctors on the UK Foundation Programme are commonly not experiencing useful inductions. The aim of the reported research was to explore trainee doctors’ experiences with induction during their first year of the Foundation Programme to identify the most useful characteristics.MethodsA questionnaire was designed to explore trainee doctors’ experiences with induction at two points during their first Foundation year, during the first and third of three rotations, to enable all induction experiences on offer during the year to be surveyed. Data were collected using an anonymous questionnaire distributed during a teaching session, with an online version available for those trainees not present. Questions gathered information about characteristics of the inductions, usefulness of components of the inductions and what gaps exist.Results192 Foundation trainee doctors completed the questionnaire during Rotation 1 and 165 during Rotation 3. The findings indicated that induction experiences at the beginning of the year, including the local Preparation for Professional Practice week, were more useful than those received for later rotations. Longer inductions were more useful than shorter. Departmental inductions were generally only moderately helpful and they missed many important characteristics. Gaps in their inductions identified by many trainees matched those aspects judged to be most useful by those trainees who had experienced these characteristics.ConclusionsMany Foundation trainee doctors are experiencing inadequate inductions, notably at the department level. Trainees are starting rotations in new departments without rudimentary knowledge about their role and responsibilities in that department, where to find equipment and documentation, who to contact and how to contact them, local preferences, policies and procedures. Unsurprisingly, trainees who do receive such information in their inductions regard it as highly useful. Action is urgently needed to improve departmental inductions so that all trainees have the information they require to work confidently and competently in each new department they rotate into.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0395-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
It is well established that trainee doctors struggle with the transition from medical school to starting work and feel unprepared for many aspects of their new role
All 11 hospitals had a Trust induction; in 8 of the hospitals this was integrated into Preparation for Professional Practice (PfPP) and it was separate in 3 hospitals
Ten of the 11 hospitals provided details about the induction experiences on offer to F1 doctors joining from another Trust for their second or third rotation; this generally comprised of the standard Trust induction only
Summary
It is well established that trainee doctors struggle with the transition from medical school to starting work and feel unprepared for many aspects of their new role. The transition from medical student to trainee doctor can be stressful, and there is evidence that trainee doctors feel unprepared for many aspects of their new role [1,2,3] This stress can be worsened for trainee doctors starting a new placement who are faced with an inadequate induction, including a lack of information about their role [1, 4]. Kilminster et al [5] explored the operationalisation of transitions, including that between medical student and the first Foundation year
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have