Abstract

BackgroundStudies show that endangered work ability (EWA) can be maintained or restored through medical rehabilitation (MR). For patients, general practitioners (GP) represent an important point of access to MR in outpatient care. However, many different barriers and shortcomings hinder GPs in both timely detection of the need for MR and the recognition of its potentials for their EWA-patients. These are necessary if GPs are to adequately inform patients about MR options and successfully support applications for MR. This study describes the evaluation of a continuing medical education (CME) module designed to improve rehabilitation-related practical performance of GPs regarding a) subjective satisfaction of GPs with the CME module, b) stability of attitudes and knowledge over time regarding rehabilitation, and c) subjective and objective changes in MR-related competencies needed to support MR applications.MethodsThis study is an open, non-randomised, pre-post-intervention study. The intervention involves a CME module for GPs (n = 1365) in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt on the topic of medical rehabilitation in connection with the federal German pension fund (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The module will be initially held as regularly scheduled meetings in moderated GP quality circles (QC), and then offered as a written self-study unit. At the end it will be evaluated by the GPs. The study’s primary focus is on the organizational practice as measured by the number of approved MR applications supported by medical reports submitted by the participating GPs in the 6 months before and 6 months after the CME module. Other study aims involve measuring self-perceived competencies of GPs, as well as their attitudes towards and knowledge of rehabilitation (both upon completing the CME and 6 months later). In addition, the level of satisfaction with the CME module will be analysed among participating GPs and QC moderators (as CME facilitators).DiscussionImplementing targeted CME on complex topics such as those involving barriers is possible, even promising, when using QCs and their moderators. Of particular importance is how aware moderating physicians are of the relevance of MR need detection and access.Ethics and disseminationThe ethics committee of the Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg has registered this study under the number 2014–13. The study will be reported on in peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. The results will be available to current and future initiatives aiming to improve detection of MR need and making MR accessible to EWEC patients needing such support to minimize the effects of chronic disease on their livess.Trial registration numberGerman Clinical Trials Register (ID number DRKS00006188) and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Universal Trial Number (UTN) U1111–1158-8334.

Highlights

  • Studies show that endangered work ability (EWA) can be maintained or restored through medical rehabilitation (MR)

  • This study investigates the effect of a continuing medical education (CME) module focusing on detection of EWA patient needs and access to MR in a pre-post comparison using a large cohort of general practitioners (GP) in the German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt

  • Chronic disease is a significant predictor of a limited ability to practice a profession and/or endangered work ability (EWA) with considerable disadvantages for the individual and society, [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies show that endangered work ability (EWA) can be maintained or restored through medical rehabilitation (MR). Many different barriers and shortcomings hinder GPs in both timely detection of the need for MR and the recognition of its potentials for their EWA-patients These are necessary if GPs are to adequately inform patients about MR options and successfully support applications for MR. Distinguishing itself through a wide range of in- and outpatient rehab facilities and programs, the DVR is ahead even of the statutory health insurance providers. The applicant for such services and resources is always the individual EWA patient, [6]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call