Forward to the past: Revisiting the role of immediate recognition in the assessment of episodic memory

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: During the clinical assessment of episodic memory, encoding ability is typically inferred from immediate recall performance. This dependency on effortful retrieval may not be optimal for estimating encoding, particularly in the presence of executive dysfunction. We examined whether a test of immediate recognition memory could meaningfully supplement recall in estimating encoding and provide unique information about memory retention.Method: Fifty older adult outpatients were administered a neuropsychological test battery including original and revised versions of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; the former (HVLT) assesses recognition memory immediately after learning trials, while the latter (HVLT-R) assesses only delayed recognition. Hierarchical regressions evaluated the incremental value of immediate recognition in predicting both delayed verbal and visual recognition. ANCOVA was performed on subgroups defined by the number of impaired performances on executive functioning tests (EF-intact, EF-1, EF-2) to examine the influence of executive impairment on measures of immediate recall and recognition. Recall- and recognition-based estimates of verbal memory retention were also compared across groups to determine whether they yield distinct patterns of memory consolidation.Results: Immediate verbal recognition accounted for significant variance in both delayed verbal and visual recognition beyond immediate recall, age, and education. Although subgroups were demographically similar, EF-1 and EF-2 performed significantly worse than EF-intact across verbal and visual memory recall. Contrastingly, there were no group differences in immediate recognition. Subgroups attained similar scores on a conventional, recall-based memory retention measure, but EF-2 showed relatively greater forgetting on a recognition-based retention measure.Conclusions: Immediate verbal recognition is an independent determinant of delayed memory performance but is not captured in current test paradigms. Study results provide proof-of-concept that recognition testing at learning can provide a more comprehensive index of encoding ability than recall alone, may facilitate disentangling memory functions from executive deficits, and could have important downstream implications for estimating memory consolidation.