Abstract

Behavioral responses by top marine predators to oceanographic features such as eddies, river plumes, storms, and coastal topography suggest that biophysical interactions in these zones affect predators' prey, foraging behaviors, and potentially fitness. However, examining these pathways is challenged by the obstacles inherent in obtaining simultaneous observations of surface and subsurface environmental fields and predator behavior. In this study, migratory movements and, in some cases, diving behavior of 40 adult female northern fur seals (NFS; Callorhinus ursinus) were quantified across their range and compared to remotely-sensed environmental data in the Gulf of Alaska and California Current ecosystems, with a particular focus off the coast of Washington State (USA) – a known foraging ground for adult female NFS and where autonomous glider sampling allowed opportunistic comparison of seal behavior to subsurface biophysical measurements. The results show that in these ecosystems, adult female habitat utilization was concentrated near prominent coastal topographic, riverine, or inlet features and within 200 km of the continental shelf break. Seal dive depths, in most ecosystems, were moderated by surface light level (solar or lunar), mirroring known behaviors of diel vertically-migrating prey. However, seal dives differed in the California Current ecosystem due to a shift to more daytime diving concentrated at or below the surface mixed layer base. Seal movement models indicate behavioral responses to season, ecosystem, and surface wind speeds; individuals also responded to mesoscale eddies, jets, and the Columbia River plume. Foraging within small scale surface features is consistent with utilization of the inner coastal transition zone and habitats near coastal capes, which are known eddy and filament generation sites. These results contribute to our knowledge of NFS migratory patterns by demonstrating surface and subsurface behavioral responses to a spatially and temporally dynamic ocean environment, thus reflecting its influence on associated NFS prey species.

Highlights

  • Northern fur seal (NFS; Callorhinus ursinus) migration and overwinter foraging represents a critical portion of its annual life cycle

  • We provide a general description of the spatial distribution of females overwintering in the California Current (CC) and Gulf of Alaska (GA) and compare seal diving depths to a time series of ocean profiles taken off the coast of Washington State (WA, USA), an important overwinter foraging ground for adult females

  • Confining the two-dimensional distribution analysis to only locations exhibiting area-restricted search behavior showed that these locations were more closely confined to the coast, with some limited area-restricted search utilization near 135uW, near the eastern terminus of the North Pacific Current, the broad eastward-flowing current that forms the boundary between the northeast Pacific subtropical and subarctic gyres (Fig. 3C; [76])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Northern fur seal (NFS; Callorhinus ursinus) migration and overwinter foraging represents a critical portion of its annual life cycle. Since female recruitment to breeding age and annual adult female survivorship are two of the most important determinants of age structure and long-term stability in the population [3,7,8,9,10,11], environmental variability affecting overwintering females could potentially exert significant influence on demography and population trends in the Eastern Stock as a whole Despite this potential importance, the pathways by which changes in ocean surface patterns influence foraging opportunities and success of individual adult female NFS outside of the Bering Sea, and how this is reflected and expressed in patterns of their horizontal movement, diving frequency, and vertical localization in the marine environment, are not fully understood. Pup production on San Miguel Island, California (USA), the largest breeding island in the California Stock, has increased over a similar time period, though with large interannual fluctuations that are mostly explained by El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events [21,22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.