Abstract
Danish sports policy is primarily aimed to support sports clubs and organizations economically and making sports facilities available to associations. Over the past three decades, however, this policy has been supplemented by state experimental and development programs. In the first wave of experimental programs in the 1980s the purpose of the programs was to stimulate experimental and innovative thinking, and the long term goal of a program was to change legislation and administration in accordance with experience of the program. Therefore, the programs were also thoroughly evaluated. Experimental and development programs were part of a decentralization ideal that can be described as communitarian. This first wave of experimental programs in the 1990s was gradually replaced by more targeted and government-controlled programs, which are more aimed at improving performance in specific areas and providing political posturing. This new type of development program is better characterized by liberal and economically oriented management ideals (New Public Management). A number of evaluations of these programs and projects show that they rarely live up to their own goals and expectations. At the same time, the evaluations are often insufficient to become wiser on the projects positive and negative experiences. At the end of the article the author suggests, that experimental and development programs to a greater extent are aimed to test – and investigate – alternative solutions to society’s diverse problems.
Highlights
I flere årtier bestod idrætspolitikken i Danmark af dansk idrætspolitik i et historisk-sociologisk primært af to spor
Der stilles gratis til rå- analyseres og diskuteres, hvilken betydning de dighed for foreningerne
Og til sidst sion af hovedparten af foreningernes udgifter til diskuteres svaghederne men også potentialerne benyttelse af egne eller lejede lokaler)
Summary
I flere årtier bestod idrætspolitikken i Danmark af dansk idrætspolitik i et historisk-sociologisk primært af to spor. Officielt som et led i en sanering af råd, udvalg og programmer, Derfor var store evalueringer også en integreret men reelt for at behage idrætsorganisationerne, del af programmerne; det vil sige, at der blev som ikke brød sig om den rolle, IPIP havde fået afsat midler til evaluering af hele programmet. Sering og opgavevaretagelse erstattes af eller suppleres med decentralisering, pri- Ud fra denne synsvinkel er strategien et blødt vatisering, udlicitering, kontraktstyring og statsligt styringsredskab på politikområder, der konkurrence på ydelser mellem offentlige er overladt til kommunerne og organisationerne udbydere, private firmaer og frivillige, non- uden specifikke anvisninger på, hvordan målene profit organisationer, skal opnås, dvs. Det centrale statslige niveaus s at brugerne får mulighed for at vælge – og forsøg på at påvirke kommunerne og andre akfravælge – mellem alternative valgmulighe- tører, så den lokale udmøntning af politikken der, så demokratisk kontrol erstattes af mar- stemmer overens med landspolitiske mål.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
