Abstract
This paper investigates the link between coalitions, i.e. informal organizational structures, and individual learning in organizations. Building on the canonical Garbage Can Model (Cohen et al., 1972), we develop an agent-based model that allows us to analyze how organizational members’ learning about others’ preferences enables the emergence of coalitions. Altering the concentration (extremeness) of individuals’ preferences, we find differences in the precision of learning. We observe how large and stable coalitions get as a result of this learning process and how the presence of this informal structure can benefit the overall organization. Subsequently, we find that the organizational benefit of coalitions is greatest for low concentration setups. In exploiting this interplay, this paper also takes a first stab at integrating two hitherto disjointed lines of thinking on learning and bargaining.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.