Abstract
Abstract High acid gas content streams, consisting primarily of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide or a combination of both are commonly generated as by-products of the sweetening process used to bring many produced gases and solution gases to pipeline specifications for sales and transport. Typically, sour gas has been extracted from acid gases through the use of Claus or other types of elemental sulphur reduction processes, the sulphur sold or stockpiled, and the residual carbon dioxide vented to atmosphere. With depressed prices for the commercial sale of sulphur and environmental concerns with the emission of large volumes of greenhouse gases, industry has shown considerable interest in the feasibility of re-injecting acid gas from sweetening processes, either back into the original producing formation, or into selected disposal zones which may consist of aquifers or previously depleted oil or gas zones. A major concern with the reinjection process is the potential for formation damage and reduced injectivity in the vicinity of the acid gas injection/disposal wells. This paper discusses screening criteria for reservoir selection for zones suitable for acid/sour gas re-injection or disposal, and highlights potential areas of concern for reduced injectivity. Such phenomena include acid gas induced formation dissolution, fines migration, precipitation and scale potential, oil or condensate banking and plugging, asphaltene and elemental sulphur deposition, hydrate plugging and multiphase flow associated with acid gas compression. Variations on acid gas injection schemes, such as concurrent contacting with produced water at elevated pressures and subsequent disposal of the sour water, will also be discussed and potential damage concerns highlighted. A variety of screening and laboratory tests and results will be presented which illustrate the various damage mechanisms outlined and provide a specific set of design criteria to evaluate the feasibility of an acid gas injection/disposal operation. Introduction Acid gases [gases which contain carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulphide (H2S)] are produced from many formations as either free gas or liberated solution gas from sour oils. These gases must be "sweetened" to selectively remove the acid gas components before the gas can be transported and sold for commercial use. A variety of sweetening processes are used to remove acid gas components (amine extraction being the most common). The sweetening process results in the production of acid gasfree "sales" gas, and a rich waste gas stream consisting of virtually pure CO2 and H2S (commonly referred to as concentrated acid gas). In the past, a variety of techniques have been used to handle acid gas streams, most of them primarily concerned with the reduction of the extremely toxic hydrogen sulphide to an inert/non-toxic reaction product. The most common technique is the Claus reaction process where the H2S gas in the acid gas stream is catalytically converted to elemental sulphur. This process was an economic one in the past, particularly in regimes of good sulphur commodity prices. Many operators deliberately attempted to exploit reservoirs containing high concentrations of H2S with sulphur recovery as the primary motivating factor.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Acid Gas
Sour Gas
High Concentrations Of H2S
Acid Gas Stream
Elemental Sulphur Deposition
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Oct 13, 2000
Jan 1, 1997
Oct 31, 2022
Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing
Jan 1, 2015
Mar 7, 2011
Mar 26, 2013
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
May 1, 2004
Egyptian Journal of Petroleum
Sep 1, 2017
Aug 5, 2014
Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles
Jan 1, 2021
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Dec 10, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 25, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 25, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 18, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 18, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 17, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 17, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 17, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 4, 2015
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Nov 3, 2015