Abstract

AbstractThe distinction between contract and tort is ambiguous under comparative law for being always relevant to the specific legal tradition and institutional background. Therefore, the intermediate field of contract and tort law inevitably depends on a specific structure of empirical method, which also lacks the abstractly determined scope in general. However, examining the manifestations and causes of the unclear boundary between contract law and tort law at the general theoretical level is still helpful in seeking solutions to legal regulation in the intermediate field.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call