Abstract

Bushveld anorthosites commonly contain the so-called “mottles” comprising irregular, typically centimetric domains of oikocrystic pyroxene or olivine enclosing small, embayed plagioclase grains. The mottles were traditionally interpreted to result from solidification of trapped intercumulus liquid or via in situ crystallisation at the top of the crystal mush. Here, we present microtextural and compositional data of a mottle to place further constraints on the formation of anorthosite layers. Element maps generated by scanning electron microscopy reveal that plagioclase within and around the mottle has markedly elevated An contents (up to An95) relative to the host anorthosite and is strongly reversely zoned. Other unusual features, some of which were reported previously, include a halo of sub-vertically oriented, acicular phlogopite around the mottle, elevated contents of disseminated sulfides, and relatively evolved yet Ni-rich olivine (Fo71–75, 3000 ppm Ni). These features are interpreted to result from reactive porous flow of hot, acidic fluid enriched in nickel and sulfur through proto norite. The fluids dissolved mafic minerals and leached alkalis from the outer rims of plagioclase grains. Reconnaissance studies suggest that reversed zoning of plagioclase is a common feature in Bushveld norite and anorthosite. This implies that reactive porous flow could have been far more pervasive than currently realised and that Bushveld anorthosite layers formed through recrystallisation of norites.

Highlights

  • Petrologists have attempted to explain the formation of anorthosites ever since the seminal experiments by Bowen (1917) who showed that plagioclase normally crystallises cotectically with pyroxene or olivine

  • We report new microtextural and compositional evidence for recrystallisation of a sample of a Bushveld anorthosite layer

  • The classical model of gravitational sorting involving plagioclase flotation (Wager and Brown 1967; Vermaak 1976; Raedeke and McCallum 1984; Eales et al 1986; Irvine et al 1998) competed with ideas interpreting anorthosites as (1) restites resulting from the flux of heat or volatiles, (2) sill-like injections of feldspathic crystal mushes followed by draining or filter pressing of residual liquid (Maier et al 2016), or (3) as precipitates from basaltic magma resulting from variations in pressure, either within the Bushveld chamber (Cawthorn and Ashwal 2009) or during trans-crustal magma ascent (Latypov et al 2020)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Petrologists have attempted to explain the formation of anorthosites ever since the seminal experiments by Bowen (1917) who showed that plagioclase normally crystallises cotectically with pyroxene or olivine. Bowen’s proposed solution was that plagioclase and pyroxene have different settling velocities in basaltic magma, resulting in pyroxenitic and feldspathic cumulates. In massif-type anorthosites, a key problem with this model has been the apparent lack of Communicated by Timothy L.

Page 2 of 12
Page 4 of 12
Summary of key observations
Page 6 of 12
Page 8 of 12
Page 10 of 12
Summary and conclusions
Page 12 of 12
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call