Abstract

Data from affinity chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation, covalent cross-linking, and fluorescence anisotropy show that profilin, thymosin beta(4), and actin form a ternary complex. In contrast, steady-state assays measuring F-actin concentration are insensitive to the formation of such a complex. Experiments using a peptide that corresponds to the N terminus of thymosin beta(4) (residues 6-22) confirm the presence of an extensive binding surface between actin and thymosin beta(4), and explain why thymosin beta(4) and profilin can bind simultaneously to actin. Surprisingly, despite much lower affinity, the N-terminal thymosin beta(4) peptide has a very slow dissociation rate constant relative to the intact protein, consistent with a catalytic effect of the C terminus on conformational change occurring at the N terminus of thymosin beta(4). Intracellular concentrations of thymosin beta(4) and profilin may greatly exceed the equilibrium dissociation constant of the ternary complex, inconsistent with models showing sequential formation of complexes of profilin-actin or thymosin beta(4)-actin during dynamic remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. The formation of a ternary complex results in a very large amplification mechanism by which profilin and thymosin beta(4) can sequester much more actin than is possible for either protein acting alone, providing an explanation for significant sequestration even if molecular crowding results in a very low critical concentration of actin in vivo.

Highlights

  • Uate, even small quantitative errors in measurement or qualitative errors in mechanism result in a wide range of plausible estimates of total sequestered actin

  • Based on assays measuring steady-state F-actin levels and the failure to obtain a covalently cross-linked ternary complex, thymosin ␤4 and profilin have been reported to bind competitively to actin (4 – 6). These results were consistent with data that suggested that the N terminus of thymosin ␤4 and profilin both bind to similar locations in subdomain 1 of actin [7,8,9]

  • Difference plots for the theoretical curves that assume ternary complex are shown in the middle panel for labeled thymosin ␤4 and in the top panel for labeled profilin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uate, even small quantitative errors in measurement or qualitative errors in mechanism result in a wide range of plausible estimates of total sequestered actin. D, data from C (closed symbols), and C, inset (open symbols), are re-plotted showing the dependence on the sum of profilin and actin concentrations, along with the results of global fitting assuming the presence of ternary complex.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.