Formal verification of a partial-order reduction technique for model checking

Abstract

Mechanical theorem proving and model checking are the two main methods of formal verification, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. While mechanical theorem proving is more general, it requires intensive human guidance. model checking is automatic, but is applicable to a more restricted class of problems. It is appealing to combine these two methods in order to take advantage of their different strengths. Prior research in this direction has focused on how to decompose a verification problem into parts each of which is manageable by one of the two methods. In this paper we explore another possibility: we use mechanical theorem proving to formally verify a meta-theory of model checking. As a case study, we use the mechanical theorem prover HOL to verify the correctness of a partial-order reduction technique for cutting down the amount of state search performed by model checkers. We choose this example for two reasons. First, this reduction technique has been implemented in the protocol analysis tool SPIN to significantly speed up the analysis of many practical protocols; hence its correctness has important practical consequences. Second, the correctness arguments involve nontrivial mathematics, the formalization of which we hope will become the basis of a formal meta-theory of many model checking algorithms and techniques. Our formalization led to a nontrivial generalization of the original informal theory. We also discuss the lessons, both encouraging and discouraging, learned from this exercise.KeywordsModel CheckFormal VerificationVerification ToolModel Check AlgorithmVerification ProblemThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.