Abstract

Background: Formal thought disorder was constitutively linked to the original concept of schizophrenia and has since been one of central features supporting its diagnosis. Bleuler considered formal thought disorder as a fundamental symptom of schizophrenia among other fundamental symptoms, including ego disorders. The contemporary concept of self-disorder represents a more developed, nuanced, and systematic approach to disturbances of self-experience than the Bleulerian concept of ego disorders. As fundamental symptoms, on Bleuler's account, are persistently present in every case, an association between these symptoms could be expected. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between self-disorder and formal thought disorder.Methods: A sample of 94 diagnostically heterogeneous patients was examined for formal thought disorder using clinical rating and a proverb test. The proverb test was analyzed for two different aspects of formal thought disorder: literal responses and bizarre responses. The sample was comprehensively assessed for psychopathology, including self-disorder as measured with the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience scale.Results: The patients, who provided bizarre responses, had a higher level of self-disorder, more negative symptoms, lower level of social functioning, and lower level of intelligence. Bizarre answers aggregated in patients diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum compared with patients outside the schizophrenia spectrum. We found moderate correlations between the two measures of formal thought disorder (clinically rated and bizarre responses) and self-disorder (0.454 [p < 0.01] and 0.328 [p < 0.01]). Literal responses did not differ between diagnostic groups and also did not correlate with bizarre responses. Specificity of bizarre responses for a diagnosis within schizophrenia spectrum was 86.89%, whereas sensitivity was 40.85%.Conclusion: The close relation between formal thought disorder and self-disorder further adds to the notion of self-disorder as a unifying psychopathological core beneath the apparently heterogeneous symptoms of schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • Formal thought disorder was constitutive for the creation of the concept of schizophrenia

  • When dividing the sample into two groups depending on diagnosis, i.e., schizophrenia spectrum disorders vs. all other disorders, we found no significant differences between the groups for literal responses

  • Looking at the whole sample, we did not find any significant correlation between self-disorder and literal responses to the proverbs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Formal thought disorder was constitutive for the creation of the concept of schizophrenia. Kraepelin [1] used the term “Zerfahrenheit,” which is sometimes translated into “incoherence,” but which refers to more subtle distortions of meaning in the patient’s speech [2] Bleuler used this term, but he introduced the general notion of “loosening of associations” as a fundamental symptom of schizophrenia [3]. The notion of formal thought disorder must be distinguished from the broad Anglo-Saxon concept of “thought disorder.”. The latter term is more inclusive and refers to a variety of disturbance of thought, including disorders of thought content such as delusions. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between self-disorder and formal thought disorder

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call