Abstract

We calculate the $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c^*(2595) l \nu$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c^*(2625) l \nu$ form factors and decay rates for all possible $b \to c l \bar\nu$ four-Fermi interactions in and beyond the Standard Model (SM), including nonzero charged lepton masses and terms up to order $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s, 1/m_{c,b})$ in the heavy quark effective theory (HQET). We point out a subtlety involving the overcompleteness of the representation of the spin-parity $1/2^+ \to 3/2^-$ antisymmetric tensor form factors, relevant also to other higher excited-state transitions, and present a general method for the counting of the physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element and their matching onto HQET. We perform a preliminary fit of a simple HQET-based parametrization of the $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c^*$ form factors at $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s, 1/m_{c,b})$ to an existing quark model, providing preliminary predictions for the lepton universality ratios $R(\Lambda_c^*)$ beyond the SM. Finally, we examine the possible incompatibility of recent lattice QCD results with expectations from the heavy-quark expansion and available experimental data.

Highlights

  • Exclusive b → c semileptonic decays to excited charm states play an intriguing dual role in probes of lepton flavor universality violation (LFUV), as well as extractions of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element jVcbj

  • The constrained structure of the sPl 1⁄4 0þ heavy quark effective theory (HQET) for Λb → Λclν has already permitted the size of the contributions at Oð1=m2cÞ in that decay to be extracted from combined fits to data plus lattice QCD

  • We examine the compatibility of these lattice results with HQET, fitting the HQET expansion for the Standard Model (SM) and new physics (NP) form factors at Oð1=mc;b; αsÞ to the LQCD predictions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Exclusive b → c semileptonic decays to excited charm states play an intriguing dual role in probes of lepton flavor universality violation (LFUV), as well as extractions of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element jVcbj. The constrained structure of the sPl 1⁄4 0þ HQET for Λb → Λclν has already permitted the size of the contributions at Oð1=m2cÞ in that decay to be extracted from combined fits to data plus lattice QCD (LQCD) calculations [9] These higher-order corrections were found to be compatible with a well-behaved HQ expansion. HQET generates relations between the form factors that must be obeyed order-by-order in 1=m, such that this kernel can be removed only after HQET matching is imposed on the tensor current Anticipating this subtlety and its relevance to other higher excited-state decays, we first present in Sec. II a general discussion of the counting of the physical form factors for any hadronic transition matrix element, showing how to determine the kernel with respect to the physical amplitudes and examining the role of HQET matching. We point out that, while HQS expectations are compatible with the measured ratio of Λb → ΛÃclν branching fractions [19], the modified fit to the LQCD results is not

General method
Why does 6 hate 7?
HQET PARAMETRIZATION FITS
Quark models
Comparison with LQCD predictions
SM and NP predictions
SUMMARY
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call