Forest landscape structure influences the cyclic‐eruptive spatial dynamics of forest tent caterpillar outbreaks

Louis‐Etienne Robert,Marie‐Josée Fortin,Brian R Sturtevant,Daniel Kneeshaw,Barry J Cooke,Philip A Townsend,Patrick M A James,Peter T Wolter

doi:10.1002/ecs2.3096

Abstract

AbstractA fundamental question in forest insect ecology is the role of forest landscape structure, particularly the amount and spatial configuration of host tree species, in shaping the dynamics of recurring forest insect outbreaks. For forest tent caterpillar (FTC), independent studies do not converge on a singular conclusion, although all indicate that forest structure influences outbreak dynamics. These studies also vary in how they treat climate as a covariate. We evaluated the relative importance of host forest landscape composition and configuration, as well as climate, for their influence on FTC outbreak cycling in the twentieth century. We predicted that FTC outbreaks would exhibit greater synchrony and intensity within areas associated with higher abundance of host trees. We reconstructed FTC outbreaks from 1928 to 2006 using tree‐ring analysis within a well‐structured experimental landscape located in northwestern Ontario and northern Minnesota. Time‐series clustering and spatial nonparametric covariance were used to determine whether similarities in time series and patterns in spatial synchrony corresponded with land management history. Using constrained ordination, we compared statistical properties of outbreak time series to landscape variables representing host abundance, forest configuration, and climate. We found no evidence of climatic effects at the scale of this study, but a significant albeit small influence of landscape structure on outbreak dynamics. Outbreaks were more synchronous and more cyclic within managed zones containing a greater relative abundance of aspen and other hardwood host tree species, compared with the more conifer‐dominated Wilderness area. Yet, we also observed asynchronous outbreak dynamics across the study area, such that correlations with slower‐changing forest landscape variables varied starkly among outbreak pulses. Consequently, the strength of relationship between landscape variables and FTC outbreak patterns varied strongly through time—a result that may explain why short‐term studies yield conclusions that are at odds with one another. Our results speak to the importance of long time series, contrasting landscape structure, use of multivariate methods, and controlling for climatic variation when investigating the effects of forest landscape structure on the cyclic‐eruptive spatial dynamics for forest defoliators.

Highlights

The forest tent caterpillar (FTC; Malacosoma disstria Hu€bner) is one of the most widely distributed forest insects in North America (Stehr and Cook 1968), exhibiting periodic outbreaks that span millions of square kilometers in eastern Canada (Cooke et al 2012), and impacting forests as far south as the Gulf Coast of the southern United States (Parry and Goyer 2004)
A fundamental question in forest insect ecology is the role of forest landscape structure, the amount and spatial configuration of host tree species, in shaping the dynamics of recurring forest insect outbreaks
We evaluated the relative importance of host forest landscape composition and configuration, as well as climate, for their influence on FTC outbreak cycling in the twentieth century

Summary

Introduction

The forest tent caterpillar (FTC; Malacosoma disstria Hu€bner) is one of the most widely distributed forest insects in North America (Stehr and Cook 1968), exhibiting periodic outbreaks that span millions of square kilometers in eastern Canada (Cooke et al 2012), and impacting forests as far south as the Gulf Coast of the southern United States (Parry and Goyer 2004) These outbreaks occasionally cause the decline of millions of hectares of aspen (Populus spp.) (Churchill et al 1964, Candau et al 2002) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marshall; Gross 1991, Wood et al 2010). To date, Roland (2005) has provided the clearest evidence that these cycles are driven by a delayed, density-dependent, predator–prey relationship This relationship varies with local forest structure due to its effects on predator dispersal (Roland and Taylor 1997, Roland et al 1997). Synchronous herbivore population cycling is often observed in the more moderate climatic regimes of eastern Canada (Cooke et al 2012) and the northern United States (Witter and Kulman 1972, Wood et al 2010)

Methods

Results

Conclusion